This is the abstract:
This article
argues that, in constitutional cases, the standing requirement should be flatly
abolished. The primary flaw with standing doctrine is that renders large swathes
of the Constitution functionally worthless, contrary to the clear intention of
the text and the structure of the document itself, as well as the intentions of
those who drafted and ratified it. Further, standing doctrine lacks textual
support, historical support, a role in maintaining the separation of powers, or
any other practical necessity to warrant its retention.
No comments:
Post a Comment